We have lots more free instructional articles in our Writing Academy. A while back I was at a huge conference where a speaker gave a lecture to a class of writers. Filtering, and an overuse of adverbs. I asked the writers next to me, and they shrugged.
Supreme Court majority decision, Reno v. ACLU June 26, Blocking and filtering software for the Internet is one of the most hotly debated topics regarding free speech and the Internet. Many have criticized blocking software for being both under and over inclusive, and others have argued that blocking software should not be used at all in public institutions such as libraries and schools.
On the other side, supporters of blocking software claim that is a legitimate method to regulate access to "inappropriate" material on the Internet, especially access for minors. But, before we begin to look at these debates directly, we have to examine how the different types of blocking software available work.
Nearly all blocking software contains several features that enable the user to customize it for their particular preferences.
So, for example, a user could instruct his browser to block all nudity and sex acts, but still allow sex education and Blocking filtering essay, while another users could do the opposite. Another common feature is the ability to unblock particular web sites when they are blocked.
So, if a user was attempting to access the CNN web Blocking filtering essay, and it was blocked because it contained, for example, the Starr report, the user could unblock it.
A final common feature of most blocking software is that it can be turned on and off for particular users on a particular machine, so that parents can turn the software on when their children are using the computer, but allow themselves unlimited access.
Blocking software works in several major ways: Most of the first blocking software worked by blocking words; the software would scan web sites for certain, unacceptable words such as "breast" or "sex.
In addition, this type of blocking has the disadvantage of not being able to scan pictures for unacceptable material.
A second type of stand-alone software blocks all material except that on an approved list. Obviously, this type of software is very effective in blocking unwanted material, but it also blocks an enormous amount of acceptable material.
A third type of blocking software blocks only those sites on its "black list" of unacceptable locations. In order for this to work, a software company hires people to scan the web for unacceptable sites and place them on the blocked list.
While this is currently the most popular type of stand-alone blocking software used, it does have some problems.
Typically, software companies consider their list of blocked sites to be proprietary information and will not release it. In addition, certain software may use different definitions for what is unacceptable than the user.
For example, some software companies will block sites containing pro-homosexual positions, while others will ban the sites of conservative Christian groups for "intolerance".
In addition, since the Internet expands and changes so rapidly that the lists cannot possibly keep up with all of the unacceptable material available.
The lists cannot help but be under inclusive. Platform for Internet Content Selection, or PICS, filtering on the web works substantially differently from the previously described types of software. The technical specifications for this type of blocking were established by PICS, which, while not mandated by law, has quickly become the de facto standard for Internet rating systems.
Building on the PICS platform are three major rating services: Each of these services provides a list of standards by which a site can be rated. The specific categories and levels that each provides are slightly different, but the basic categories include sex, violence, language, and nudity.
A person simply fills out a form describing what levels of these and other categories appear on the site, and the rating is complete.
In addition, the PICS standard allows for third parties to rate any content on the Internet and make their ratings available.Blocking & Filtering Essay - "Any content-based regulation of the Internet, no matter how benign the purpose, could burn the global village to roast the pig." U.S.
Supreme Court majority decision, Reno v. There is also the issue of the filtering software's inability to distinguish between pornography and sexually related topics, and hindering internet research by blocking sites with subject matter like sex education or help for rape victims/5(3).
The Significance of Lighting, Blocking and Panning in Kane’s Declaration of Principles Words 4 Pages In cinema, lighting, blocking and panning drastically influence what . Blocking & Filtering This Essay Blocking & Filtering and other 64,+ term papers, college essay examples and free essays are available now on alphabetnyc.com Autor: review • August 30, • Essay • 1, Words (7 Pages) • 1, Views.
Blocking, Filtering, and Monitoring. Radio and TV | Internet Filtering in fact it was a long essay about the dangers inherent in such a system. Commission staff regularly observe censors removing posts that are either too critical of the government, or that might be acceptable by themselves but have generated too many responses critical of.
Blocking & Filtering Suzuki Style Method: Breaking Down Culture Blocks The Guardians of the World Order Have Sought to Establish Democracy in one Sense of the Term, While Blocking It .